Preliminary Design Through Graphs: A Tool for Automatic Layout Distribution
Keywords:Graph Representations, Parametric Design, Automated Layout Distributions
Diagrams are essential in the preliminary stages of design for understanding distributive aspects and assisting the decision-making process. By drawing a schematic graph, designers can visualize in a synthetic way the relationships between many aspects: functions and spaces, distribution of layouts, space adjacency, influence of traffic flows within a facility layout, and so on. This process can be automated through the use of modern Information and Communication Technologies tools (ICT) that allow the designers to manage a large quantity of information.
The work that we will present is part of an on-going research project into how modern parametric software influences decision-making on the basis of automatic and optimized layout distribution. The method involves two phases: the first aims to define the ontological relation between spaces, with particular reference to a specific building typology (rules of aggregation of spaces); the second entails the implementation of these rules through the use of specialist software. The generation of ontological relations begins with the collection of data from historical manuals and analyses of case studies. These analyses aim to generate a “relationship matrix” based on preferences of space adjacency. The phase of implementing the previously defined rules is based on the use of Grasshopper to analyse and visualize different layout configurations. The layout is generated by simulating a process involving the collision of spheres, which represents specific functions of the design program. The spheres are attracted or rejected as a function of the relationships matrix, as defined above. The layout thus obtained will remain in a sort of abstract state independnt of information about the exterior form, but will still provide a useful tool for the decision-making process. In addition, preliminary results gathered through the analysis of case studies will be presented. These results provide a good variety of layout distributions over a short time for medium and large-scale problems.
Arvin, S. A., & House, D. H. (2002). Modelling architectural design objectives in physically based space planning. Automation in Construction, 213-225
Alexander, C. 1964. Notes on Synthesis of Form. Cambridge, Massachusetts, England: Harvard University Press.
Broadbent, G. H. (1970). La creatività. In S. A. Gregory, Progettazione razionale. Padova: Marsilio.
Coons, S. (1964). Computer Aid Design. First Boston Architectrual Center Conference. Boston: MIT
Donato V. 2014. Transformability of Existing Building: a system based on BIM technologies for the information management, University of Florence and TU Braunschweig. PhD Thesis, pp. 31-43.
Do, E. Y.-L., Gross, M. D. .2001. Thinking with diagrams in architectural design. Artificial Intelligence Review, 15, 135-149.
Edwards, B. 1979. Drawing on the right side of the brain: A course in enhancing creativity and artistic confidence. New York: Putnam.
Kalay, Y. E. 2004. Architecture's New Media - Principle, Theory, and Methods of Computer-Aided Design. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Terzidis, K., & Vakalo, E. (1992). The role of Computers in Architectural Design. In F. L. Baerle (Ed.), Socio-environmental Metamorphoses: Proceedings 12th International Conference of the IAPS In Socio-environmental Metamorphoses: Proceedings 12th International Conference of the IAPS (pp. 186-191). Halkidiki: Aristotle University Press.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 ICONARCH International Congress of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.