An Approach to Urban Regeneration from User’s Perspective: Çukurambar / Kızılırmak Neighborhood in Ankara / Turkey

Authors

  • Büşra Durmaz
  • Cihan Erçetin

Keywords:

Urban regeneration, Gentrification, Users’ perspective, Çukurambar and Kızılırmak Neighborhoods

Abstract

In recent few decades, urban areas have been changing and regeneration projects have been implemented to provide new healthier and more profitable living environment. It is obvious that a social, namely users’, aspect also exists in the process of regeneration. This research will reveal an investigation to generate the analysis of urban regeneration from user’s perspective. In urban regeneration process, there are certain actors such as old residents (initial property owners), developers, real estate agencies and new residents (latter residents moved to area after regeneration). Çukurambar-Kızılırmak Neighborhoods, as the case study area, were gecekondu (squatter settlement) area in 1960s. After urban development in Ankara towards western and southwestern directions, Çukurambar-Kızılırmak Neighborhoods have become an attractive urban regeneration zone in terms of land values. Therefore, in consequence of urban regeneration, almost all the area has been transformed to high-rise luxury apartment blocks and residence towers.

In this research, social aspect of regeneration process will be examined by the analysis of user’s perspective. Apart from physical consequences of gecekondu regeneration by reference to architectural styles and density, a winner-loser analysis will be generated considering the actors in urban regeneration process as a social aspect. In research process, participant observation (author as also a resident in Çukurambar urban regeneration area), in-depth interviews and analysis of written and visual documents will be used as methodology tools. In the end, winners and losers of urban regeneration will be critically discussed by revealing implications on the basis of user’s opinions and desires on urban regeneration process.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

-Uzun, B., Çete, M., & Palancıoğlu, H. (2010). Legalizing and Upgrading Illegal Settlements in Turkey. Habitat International, 34, pp. 204-209

- Turok, I. (2004). Urban Regeneration: What Can Be Done and What Should Be Avoided? International Urban Regeneration Implementations Symposium (pp. 63-82). İstanbul: İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi

- Roberts, P. (2000). The Evolution, Definition and Purpose of Urban Regeneration. In P. Roberts, & H. Sykes, Urban Regeneration A Handbook (pp. 9-37). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications

- Dündar, Ö. (2003). Kentsel Dönüşüm Uygulamalarının Sonuçları Üzerine Kavramsal Bir Tartışma. In P. P. Özden, İ. Karakaş, S. Turgut, H. Yakar, D. Erdem, & N. Paloğlu, Kentsel Dönüşüm Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı (pp. 65-74). İstanbul: Yıldız Teknik Ünivesitesi Basım Yayın Merkezi.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-13

How to Cite

Durmaz, B., & Erçetin, C. (2017). An Approach to Urban Regeneration from User’s Perspective: Çukurambar / Kızılırmak Neighborhood in Ankara / Turkey. ICONARCH International Congress of Architecture and Planning, (1), 58–67. Retrieved from https://iconarch.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarch/article/view/162