Spatial Cognition through a Nonvisual Experience

Authors

  • Mine Tunçok Sarıberberoğlu
  • Zeynep Tarçın Turgay
  • Nevşet Gül Çanakçıoğlu

Keywords:

Cognitive map, Space Syntax, Spatial Cognition, Spatial Experience

Abstract

The notion examining the interaction between the individual and the physical setting is the concept of perception, which is evaluated by Hall (1966) as the main competence that living organisms possess for survival. In this manner, perceptual product can be defined as the result of perceptual processes through which the stimuli from the environment are converted into cognitive data by the receptor cells of sense organs - mainly the eye. According to Pallasmaa (2005), the eye became the centre of the perceptual world through the invention of perspectival representation, which turned into a symbolic form both describing and conditioning perception.

Also, such concepts as Merleau-Ponty’s (2005) bodily experience, a classification of perceptual modalities, have been partly replaced by more holistic approaches, considering the experience as the most essential factor of the physical setting which is defined as the collection of cognitive data of individuals formed by various information processing circumstances (Downs and Stea, 2011).

Cognitive mapping is the process of a mental representation which people acquire, code, store, recall and decode information about the relative location and attributes of the physical setting (Downs and Stea 2011). This imaged information includes impressions about structure or appearance of a place, its relative location, its use and its values. On the other hand, a specific place’s structure, value and relative relations can be analysed in a more analytical way. Space syntax is a method for describing and analysing the relationships between spaces and a set of techniques for the representation, quantification, and interpretation of spatial relations in buildings and settlements. Contributing to this debate, this paper explores the cognitive data generated by sighted people in a non-visual bodily experience, as they are guided through “Dialogue in the Dark”, a thematic environment consisting of completely dark rooms equipped with scent, sound, wind and tactile simulations of a specific urban setting and syntactic relations of that space.

In this regard, a two-step methodology is applied: the first step comprises cognitive data from the cognitive maps drawn by participants just after their experience, while the second one comprises existing spatial data revealed by syntactic analyses. Finally, the correlation between the cognitive frequencies of the experienced nodes in each cognitive map and the syntactic values of the setting are statistically analysed.

Statistical outcomes show that without vision, no correlation is found between the syntactic values and the frequency of spaces but, auditive and tactile characteristics of the spaces are significantly correlated with the frequencies of the spaces.

In conclusion, the results show that spatial cognition without vision is mainly dependent on bodily experience of the self which is stimulated mostly by auditive and tactile senses, and also that the effect of the syntactic characteristics of the space derived from visual parameters loosens the ties with the notion of spatial cognition.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

-Bafna, S. 2003. Space syntax: A brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques. Environment and Behavior 35.1: 17-29.

-Downs, R. M. and Stea, D. 2011. ‘Cognitive maps and spatial behavior: Process and products’. In: Dodge, M., Rob Kitchin, R. and Perkins C. (eds.), The Map Reader: Theories of Mapping Practice and Cartographic Representation, London: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 312- 317.

-Foulke, E. 1983. Perception cognition and the mobility of blind pedestrians. In M. Potegal, (Ed.), Spatial abilities: development and physiological foundations New York: Academic Press. pp.55-76.

-Goldstein, B. 2011. Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research and Everyday Experience (Bilişsel Psikoloji transl. by Gündüz, O. in 2013), İstanbul: Kaknüs Yayınları.

-Golledge, R. G. & Stimpson, R. J. 1997. Spatial Behaviour: A geographic perspective. New York: The Guilford Press.

-Hall, E. 1966. The Hidden Dimension Doubleday & Company, Inc. Garden City, Ney.

-Jacobson, R. D. 1998. Cognitive mapping without sight: Four preliminary studies of spatial learning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(3), 289-305.

-Kaplan, S., 1973, ‘Cognitive maps, human needs and the designed environment’. In: W. F. E. Preiser (eds.), Environmental design research. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross. pp. 275-283.

-Kitchin, R.M., Blades, M. and Golledge. R.G. 1997 "Understanding spatial concepts at the geographic scale without the use of vision." Progress in Human Geography 21.2: 225-242.

-Klatzky, R.L., Golledge, R.G., Loomis, J.M., Cicinelli, J.G. and Pellegrino, J.W. 1995 Performance of blind and sighted persons on spatial tasks. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 89, 70-82.

-Kuipers, B., 1978. Modelling Spatial Knowledge, Cognitive Science, 2, pp.129.153.

-Lawson, B., 2001. Language of Space, Architectural Press, Oxford.

-Lynch, K, 1960. The Image of the City, MIT Press: Cambridge.

-Long, Y., Baran, P. K., Moore, R. 2007, ‘The Role of Space Syntax in Spatial Cognition: evidence from urban China’, in Kubat A. S., Güney Y.İ. , Ertekin Ö., (eds) in the Proceedings of the Sixth International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul: ITU Faculty of Architecture, p.129.01-129.06.

-Merleau-Ponty, M. 2005. Algılanan Dünya, Çev. Ömer Aygün, İstanbul: Metis.

-Ungar, S. 2000. Cognitive mapping without visual experience. In Kitchin, R. & Freundschuh, S. (eds) Cognitive Mapping: Past Present and Future. London: Routledge.

-Unlu. A., 1998. Çevresel Tasarımda İlk Kavramlar, İTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Baskı Atölyesi, İstanbul.

-Pallasmaa, J., 2005. The Eyes of The Skin, Architecture and the senses, John Wiley and Sons Ltd. UK.

-Passini, R., Proulx, G. 1988. Wayfinding without vision an experiment with congenitally totally blind people. Environment and Behavior, 20(2), 227-252.

-Penn, A. 2003. ‘Space Syntax and Spatial Cognition or Why the axial line?’. In Environment and Behavior, Vol. 35 (1), pp.30-65.

-Tuncer, E. 2007. Perception and Intelligibility in the Context of Spatial Syntax and Spatial Cognition, in Kubat A. S. et al (eds) in the Proceedings, 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, İstanbul.

-Tarçın Turgay, Z., Çanakçıoğlu, N.G and Sarıberberoğlu. M.T. 2015. How does a child act in a theme park?. in Karimi K. (eds) in the 10th International Space Syntax Symposium, London.

-Zheng, L. & Weimin. G., 2010. A spatial cognition investigation by using the integrated methodology combined with cognitive map and space syntax. Computer Science and Education (ICCSE), 5th International Conference on. IEEE.

-Zimring, C., & Dalton.C.R., 2003. "Linking objective measures of space to cognition and action." Environment and Behavior 35.1: 3-16.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-13

How to Cite

Tunçok Sarıberberoğlu, M., Tarçın Turgay, Z., & Çanakçıoğlu, N. G. (2017). Spatial Cognition through a Nonvisual Experience. ICONARCH International Congress of Architecture and Planning, (1), 181–191. Retrieved from https://iconarch.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarch/article/view/172