A Study on the Impact of Experiencing ‘Cultural Heritage’ in Digital Environment on Urban Memory and Future Scenarios

Authors

  • Seda Nehir Akgün
  • Atacan Akgün

Keywords:

Representation of the past, Cultural Heritage, Digital environment, Urban memory, Spirit of the place

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impact of using digital technologies on representation of multi-cultural heritage sites and its possible consequences on ‘memory’ of the place by literature survey and theoretical proposals. Multi-cultural is the keyword, because being settled at a strategic point from many aspects such as liveability, vitality or security cause the further civilizations have settled on the footprints of previous civilizations. Consequently, settlements turned into multi-layered areas mostly and a conservation problem occurs due to representation of such a cultural diversity or historic and architectural continuity. Urban settlements have important phases, which were significant and represents the characteristic of a specific period. Accordingly, representation of significant periods of the past of urban settlements is vital and also important to create and sustain of the urban memory. Conventional conservation and representation technics are not enough to provide a sustainable conservation process, because if the audience would not appropriate the cultural heritage, they do not endeavour for preserving it. However, it is mostly not possible to experience all the previous layers at multi-cultural heritage sites. In single building scale, it is harder in comparison with in urban archaeology scale due to following the urban topography at least for experts is possible. Still, to foster public awareness and attraction, alternative methods are being tried to represent the cultural heritage, because a sustainable conservation needs participation of the audience. CAVE (Computer Aided Virtual Environment) and BIM (Building Information Modelling) are the examples of creation of built environment in digital context. CAVE is the one, which creates a digital environment to feel and live in; on the other hand, BIM is the source for documentation. Whereas the documentation is the first and the most important phase of conservation, representation of documented heritage is the final phase and these processes are integrated. However, they should be discussed considering their impact on spirit of the place. Is it possible to experience the place without losing spirit of the place in a digital environment? Or, does it help the audience feel, understand and keep the memory of the place? For the future scenarios, cultural heritage sites or cities can be produced -without demolishing the existed ones- in digital environment for keeping the significant periods and contribution to urban memory.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

-Akurgal, E. 1978. Ancient Civilizations and Ruins of Turkey From Prehistoric Times Until The End of Roman Empire (translated by J. Whybrow and M. Emre). Haşet Kitabevi, İstanbul.

-Basa, İ. 2015 Kentsel Hafızanın Sürdürülebilirliği: Bir Mimarlık Stüdyosu Deneyimi. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, pp. 27-42.

-Carman, J. 2005. Against Cultural Property: Archaeology, Heritage and Ownership. Duckworth, London.

-De La Tore, M. (ed). 2002. Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage (Research Report). The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles.

-Eastman, C. Teicholz, P. Sacks, R. and Liston, K. 2011. BIM Handbook 2nd Edition. Wiley, New Jersey.

-Feilden, B. M. and Jokilehto, J. 1998. Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites, ICCROM, Rome.

-Frascari, M. Hale, J. and Starkey, B. 2007. From Models to Drawings: Imagination and Representation in Architecture. Routledge, New York.

-Jerome, P. 2014. The Value-Based Approach to Cultural Heritage Preservation, APT Bulletin 45 2/3, pp. 3-8.

-Jiven, G. and Larkham, P.J. 2003. Sense of a Place, Authenticity and Character: A Commentary. Journal of Urban Design 8/1, pp. 67-81.

-Jokilehto, J. 2002. A History of the Architectural Conservation, Elsevier, Oxford.

-Martens, B. Mark, E. And Yen-wen Cheng, N. 2006. Threshold between Analog and Digital Represenation. In 24th eCAADe Conference Proceeding, V. Bourdakis and D. Charitos (eds), pp. 372-383, Volos.

-Nora, P. 1989. Between Memory and History: Les lieux de memoire. Representations 26, pp 7-24.

-Norberg-Schulz, C. 1980. Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture, Rizzoli, New York.

-Orbaşlı, A. 2013. ‘Archaelogical Site Management and Local Development’, Conservation and Management of Arcaeological Sites 15, pp.237-253.

-Özdoğan, M. 2006. Türk Arkeolojisinin Sorunları ve Koruma Politikaları, Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, İstanbul.

-Quebec Declaration on the Preservation of the Spirit of the Place. 2008. General Assebly of ICOMOS, Quebec (Canada).

-Rossi, A. 1982. The Architecture of a City, MIT Press, Cambridge.

-Serin, U. 2008. Byzantium-Early Islamand Byzantine Cultural Heritage in Turkey. In P. Atzaka, C. Papakyrikou and A. Pilota (eds), Byzantium Early Islam Cultural Heritage Management: Shared Experience beyond Boundaries, pp. 209-239. Hellenic Society for he Protection of he Environment and he Cultural Heritage, Thessaloniki.

-The BURRA Charter. 1999. General Assembly of ICOMOS, Australia.

-The ICOMOS Charter for the Interpretation and Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites. 2008. General Assembly of ICOMOS, Québec (Canada).

-The Venice Charter. 1964. General Assembly of ICOMOS. Italia.

-Trigg, D. 2012. The Memory of Place A Phenomenology of he Uncanny. Ohio University Press, Ohio.

-Wang, F. Li, W. Liu, Y. And Cai, H. 2016. Measurement and Application of Urban Memory Related to Historic Areas in Beijing. In F. Wang and M. Prominski (eds), Urbanization and Locality. Springer Science+Business Media, Singapore.

-Van Der Wolf, P. 1994. CAD Frameworks Principles and Architecture. Springer Science+Business Media, B.V.Delft.

-Yee, N. and Bailenson, J.N. 2009. The Difference Between Being and Seeing: He Relative Contribution of Self-Perception and Priming to Behavioral Changes via Digital Self Representation. Media Psychology 12/2, pp. 195-209.

-http://www.autodesk.com/solutions/bim/hub/u-mi-uses-bim-for-urban-planning-land-design (2017)

- http://www.tholos254.gr/projects/priene/en / (2017)

- http://www.tholos254.gr/projects/miletus/index-en.html (2017)

-https://www.nationaltrustcanada.ca/sites/www.heritagecanada.org/files/Maddigan_ BIM_HCF_CAHP_Presentation_R2_2012_10_10.pdf (2017)

-http://www.builtworlds.com/news/2015/12/3/watch-the-worlds-largest-bim-cave (2017)

- https://www.ribaj.com/intelligence/bim-for-historic-buildings (2017)

Downloads

Published

2017-05-13

How to Cite

Akgün, S. N., & Akgün, A. (2017). A Study on the Impact of Experiencing ‘Cultural Heritage’ in Digital Environment on Urban Memory and Future Scenarios. ICONARCH International Congress of Architecture and Planning, (1), 547–557. Retrieved from https://iconarch.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarch/article/view/205