"Practice" in Interior Design/Architecture Education

Authors

  • Murat Özdamar

Keywords:

Interior Architecture/Design Education, Bauhaus, Practice in Education

Abstract

With the start of “interior architecture”, the educational formation, had an active role as much as the profession itself. Today, two approaches are the basis of the approaches of today's educational programs. The first one; the “Beaux-Arts”, and recognized as the pioneer of academic design education; and the other one is the “Bauhaus”.

In this study, the effect of Bauhaus education format and the differences occurred by the time within the Interior Architecture education in our country is demonstrated. Especially with the section of the course load, depending on their examinations with the conclusions reached by the numerical values obtained with interior design suggestions, which are made for the required fields in education.

“The Design Training Models” of the Interior Design training, emphasized and, investigated depending on the similarities and differences between educational models and the emerging results, points those need to be emphasized.

The educational programs of the schools in Turkey and Bauhaus education program have been put forward, and the evaluations have been made within the differences between them depending on the course groups and weights. The assessments are done with 57 universities in Turkey; the results are reached through the process/time information, which was allocated for the courses by the universities.

The sections for the training program has been investigated according to the comparisons by the course weights. By combining the hours of the curriculum of the departments. The numerical values are obtained and the results are evaluated.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Aslanoglu, İ.. (1988). Modernizmin Tanımı, Sınırları, Erken Yirminci Yüzyil Mimarlıgında Farklı Tavırlar. ODTÜ MFD, 8(1), 59-66.

Aydogan, K. E. B. (2010). Sanat Egitimi ve Sanat Elestirisi: Türkiye’de Görsel Sanatlar Ögretmeni Yetistiren Kurumlar Örnegi. Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskisehir.

Balamir, A.K., (1985). Mimarlık Söyleminin Değişimi ve Eğitim Programları. Mimarlık

/8, 9-15. Erişim tarihi: 11.11.2017. Web adresi: http://dergi.mo.org.tr/dergiler/4/524/7674.pdf

Cret, P.P., 1941. The Ecole des Beaux-Arts and Architectuıral Education. JSAH - Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 1, 2. Sf: 3-15.

Carlhian, J.P., 1979. The Ecole des Beaux-Arts: Modes and Manners. JAE- Journal of Architectural Education. V.33, No:2, sf: 7-17.

Edwards, C.. (2011). Interior design: A critical introduction. UK: Berg PLC.

Ertek, H., (1999). İçmimarlık Kapsamında Temel Tasarım Eğitimi Kuramlarına Bir Yaklaşım. Yayınlanmamış Sanatta Yeterlilik Tezi. Ankara, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Hacettepe Üniversitesi. Türkiye.

(2014). “İçmimarlık Eğitiminde Ekolleşme”. 1. Uluslararası İçmimarlık Eğitimi Sempozyumu.

Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Türkiye.

Gökhan, Ç. B., Atasoy, A., 2005. İç Mimarlık Eğitim Programı Tasarımı ve Geliştirme Modeli Önerisi. İTÜ Dergisi, Mimarlık, Planlama, Tasarım, (4): 2: 25-36.

Higgins, I.. 2015, Spatial Strategies for Interior Design, London. Laurance King Publishing.

Kaptan, B. B.. (2003). 20. Yüzyıldaki Toplumsal Değişimler Paralelinde İç Mekân Tasarımı Eğitiminin Gelişimi. Eskişehir: CIP-Anadolu Üniversitesi Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Merkezi.

Kirkham, P., Sparke, K. (2000). A Woman’s Place? In Pat Kirkham, ed. Women, Designers in the USA 1900-2000. New Heaven: Yale University Press, 305-316.

Malnar, Joy M., Frank V.. (1992). The Interior Dimension: A Theoretical Approach to Enclosed Space. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Meshur, F. (2011). Bauhaus 1919-1932: Modernitenin Huzursuzlugu. Grafik Tasarım, Görsel İletişim Kültürü Dergisi, (41), 22-27.

Özdamar, M. (2019) Türkiye’de İçmimarlik Eğitiminde Değişen Anlayişlar (Paradigmalar).

Yayınlanmamış Sanatta Yeterlilik Tezi. Ankara, Güzel Sanatlar Enstitüsü, İç Mimarlık ve Çevre Tasarımı Ana Bilim Dalı, Hacettepe Üniversitesi.

Özer B., Kuban D., Kulaksızoğlu E., Aksoy E., Erim G., 1969. Mimarlık Eğitiminin Amaçları ve Öğretim Programları ile İlgili Sorunlar. Mimarlık, 7-9. 21-36.

Parsons the New School for Design. 2012. Interior design (MFA).

Pile, J.. (2009). A History of Interior Design (3rd ed.). London: Laurence King, Publishing. Pottgiesser, U.. (2011). Interior Design as an Academic Discipline in Germany. Journal of

Interior Design 36 (4): v-xiv.

Sarı, R. M. (2005). Tarihi Çevre Içindeki Mimari Tasarımlarda “-Izm”Ler; Modernism, Postmodernizm, Dekonstruktivizm. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.

Şumnu, U. 2013. Erken Cumhuriyet Döneminde Mobilya – Dahili Mimari. 23- 25”. Ankara.

TMMOB-İçmimarlar Odası.

Tate, A., Smith C. R.. (1986). Interior Design in the 20th Century. New York: Harper and Row Publishers

The Bauhaus-Universität Weimar (2019). The History of the Bauhaus-Universität

Weimar. Erişim tarihi: 27.04.2019. Web adresi: https://www.uniweimar.de/en/university/profile/portrait/history/

Unansal, N. (2013). Türkiye’de İçmimarlık Tarihine Bir Bakış-1. İçmimar, (29), 128-132.

Ankara. TMMOB-İçmimarlar Odası.

Ülkü, C. (2008). Sanat Egitimi, Sanat ve Köy Enstitüleri. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 37-45.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-15

How to Cite

Özdamar, M. . (2020). "Practice" in Interior Design/Architecture Education. ICONARCH International Congress of Architecture and Planning, (Iconarch -IV Proceeding Book), 905–927. Retrieved from https://iconarch.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarch/article/view/298

Issue

Section

SESSION 8A Theme: Architectural/Urban Design, Art and Aesthetics