Assessing Incremental Refurbishment as An Alternative to Demolish & Build-Anew: Lessons from An Architectural Design Studio Experience

Authors

  • Emre Altürk
  • Emrah AltInok

Keywords:

Urban Transformation, Incremental/piecemeal Refurbishment, In- fill Development, Community-led Design, Architectural Design Pedagogy

Abstract

In this paper, we report on an attempt to test an alternative to the prevalent urban transformation practice in Turkey, which we made within the context and framework of an undergraduate architectural design studio. In Turkey, urban transformation almost always entails the destruction of the existing buildings and constructing brand-new ones when it comes to residential areas. This practice is ubiquitous and quite unchallenged. While urban transformation has historically been quite destructive in most countries, in recent decades there is an ongoing discussion its the alternatives, as well as various accomplished examples. Within this context, we tackled the transformation of a large residential area in Çanakkale, Turkey, for which a wholesale renewal endeavor is underway for some time, but currently is at a standstill. We started the studio with architectural and urban analyses of the area and carried out a questionnaire in order to survey the residents’ demographic and economic profile, socio-spatial practices, needs and wants regarding their dwelling and its surroundings. Our studio brief precluded demolishing most buildings and asked for proposals for their revision and refurbishment along the lines of research findings and students’ site plan decisions. The brief also required a level of strategic densification through new dwellings, social amenities, and commercial units, in order to increase the program and user diversity and to finance the whole endeavor. In what follows, we contextualize our position and contrast our studio experience with the dominant approach to urban transformation. We argue considering transformation as a process of piecemeal refurbishment of the existing fabric and incremental enhancement of the site with new buildings has advantages over the option of demolishing the entire area; especially in terms of the key notions of continuity, ecology, participation, and economy. We also dwell on the various benefits of this exercise in terms of architectural design pedagogy.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Acioly, C. C. (1994). Incremental Land Development in Brasilia: Can the Urban Poor Escape from Suburbanisation?. Third World Planning Review, 16(3), 243.

Altınok, E. (2012). Kentsel Mekânın Yeniden Organizasyonun Ekonomi Politiği ve Mülkiyete Müdahale - 2000 Sonrası Dönemde İstanbul TOKİ Örneği [The political economy of reorganization of urban space and interventions on the urban land tenure - the case of Istanbul-MHA in post 2000 era] (Doctoral dissertation). İstanbul: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

Aksoy, B.C. & Bingöl, Ö. (2018, September). Konut İç Mekanlarında Tektipleşme [Homoge- nization of Dwelling Interiors]. XXI. Retrieved from https://xxi.com.tr/i/ konut-ic- mekanlarinda-tektiplesme.

Amoako, C., & Boamah, E. F. (2017). Build as you earn and learn: informal urbanism and incremental housing financing in Kumasi, Ghana. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 32(3), 429-448.

Barker, M. (2019). Incremental Urban Intensification: Managing the Re-Urbanization of Toronto's Avenues (Master's thesis, University of Waterloo).

Bell, S. et al. (2014). Making Decisions on the Demolition or Refurbishment of Social Housing. UCL Policy Briefing, June 2014.

Berman, M. (1982). All That Is Solid Melts into Air. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Bozdoğan, S. & Akcan, E. (2012). Housing in the Metropolis. In Turkey: Modern Architectures in History (pp. 139-169). London: Reaktion Books.

Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., & Mayer, M. (Eds.). (2012). Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city. London: Routledge.

Carpino, C., Bruno, R., & Arcuri, N. (2018). Social housing refurbishment in Mediterranean climate: Cost-optimal analysis towards the n-ZEB target. Energy and Buildings, 174, 642-656.Castells, M. (1977 [1972]). The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach, London: Edward Arnold.

Chandler, T. & Fox, G. (1974). 3000 Years of Urban Growth. New York, London: Academic Press.

Choay, F. (1969). The Modern City: Planning in the 19th Century. New York: George Braziller.

Crawford, K., Johnson, C., Davies, F., Joo, S. and Bell, S. (2014). Demolition or Refurbishment of Social Housing? A Review of the Evidence, report by the UCL Urban Lab and Engineering Exchange for Just Space and the London Tenants Federation, London: University College London.

Ferreri, M. (2018). Refurbishment vs demolition? Social housing campaigning for degrowth, in Housing for Degrowth: Principles, Models, Challenges and Opportunities. Edited by Anitra Nelson and François Schneider. Routledge: London, p. 109-119.

Forsyth, A. et al. (2016). Revitalizing Places: Improving Housing and Neighborhoods from Block to Metropolis. Cambridge: Harvard University Graduate School of Design.

Gandelsonas, M. (1998). The City as the Object of Architecture. Assemblage, 37, 128-144.

Geray, C. (2010). AKP ve Konut: Toplumsal Konut Yöneltisi Açısından TOKİ Uygulamaları. In İ. Uzgel, B. Duru (Eds.), AKP Kitabı (pp. 743‐753). Ankara: Phoenix Yayınları.

Griffin, C. T. (2005). Defining Permanence: Structuring Housing for Incremental Change

(Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley).

Hall, A. C. (1997). Dealing with incremental change: an application of urban morphology to design control. Journal of Urban Design, 2(3), 221-239.

Hall, Peter. (2002). Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Blackwell.

Hall, T. & Barrett, H. (2018). Urban geography. London: Routledge.

Harnish, C. (2018). Eco-Incremental Housing: Researching Typologies and Systems in Pursuit of a Community-Based Approach to Housing Upgrades in Informal Contexts. In Sustainable Urban Development and Globalization, 449-461. Springer, Cham.

Harvey, D. (1976). Social justice and the City, Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.

Healey, P. (2012). “The Planning Project” in Readings in Planning Theory, eds. Susan Fainstein and James DeFilippis. Wiley Blackwell.

Jacobs, J. (1961). Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.

van Karnenbeek, L., & Janssen-Jansen, L. (2018). Playing by the rules? Analysing incremental urban developments. Land use policy, 72, 402-409.

Koolhaas, R. (1978). Delirious New York, a Retroactive Manifesto for Manhattan. New York: The Monacelli Press.

Koolhaas, R. (1995). SMLXL. New York: Monacelli Press.

Kovacic, I., Summer, M., & Achammer, C. (2013). Life-cycle oriented renovation strategies for social housing stock. Organization, technology & management in construction: an international journal, 5(2), 881-891.

Kösten, E. Y. Ö. (2016). Kentsel Dönüşümün Tek Alternatifi mi var? Yık-Yap [Is there a Single Alternative to Urban Transformation? Demolish-Construct]. Mimarlık, 387. Retrieved from http://www.mimarlikdergisi.com/index.cfm?sayfa=mimarlik& DergiSayi=401&RecID=3836#

Lefebvre, H. (1996 [1968]). "The right to the city," in H. Lefebvre, Writings on Cities,E. Kofinan and E. Lebas (eds), Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell, 63-184.

Lefebvre, H. (2003 [1970]). The Urban Revolution, trans. by R. Bonanno, Minneapolis: Umversity of Minnesota Press.

Lizarralde, G. (2011). Stakeholder participation and incremental housing in subsidized housing projects in Colombia and South Africa. Habitat International, 35(2), 175- 187.

Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Maharaj, B. (1989). Residential renovation in the low income public housing sector: A case study in Merebank. Development Southern Africa, 6(1), 43-57.

Malaque III, I., Bartsch, K., & Scriver, P. (2015). Learning from informal settlements: provision and incremental construction of housing for the urban poor in Davao City, Philippines. In Living and Learning: Research for a Better Built Environment: 49th International Conference of the Architectural Science Association 2015 (pp. 163-172).

Marcuse, P. (2012). “The Three Historic Currents of City Planning” in Readings in Planning Theory, eds. Susan Fainstein and James DeFilippis. Wiley Blackwell.

Massey, D. (1999). Cities in the World. In D. Massey, et al (Eds.) City Worlds. London: Routledge.

Offia Ibem, E., Aduwo, E. B., & Uwakonye, O. (2012). Adequacy of incremental construction strategy for housing low-income urban residents in Ogun State, Nigeria. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 2(2), 182-194.

Özüerken, A. Ş. (1996). Cooperatives and Housing Production. In Y. Sey (Eds.), Housing and Settlement in Anatolia: A Historical Perspective (pp. 355-365). İstanbul: Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı.

Romaya, S. (2002). Incremental transformations for sustainable urban settlements. In Building Sustainable Urban Settlements: Approaches and case studies in the developing world (p. 2). Practical Action Publishing.

Rossi, A. (1982). Architecture of the City. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. First published in Italian: Architettura della Città (1966).

Sendra, P. (2018). Community-Led Social Housing Regeneration: From Government-Led Programmes to Community Initiatives. In Urban Renewal, Community and Participation, 71-87. Springer, Cham.

Smithson, P. (1968). In A. Smithson (Eds.), Team X Primer. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Taylor, N. (1998). Urban planning theory since 1945. Sage.

Tekeli, İ. (2012). Türkiye’de Yaşamda ve Yazında Konutun Öyküsü (1923-1980) [The Story of Housing in Turkey in Life and in Literature (1923-1980)]. Istanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.

Terracciano, A. (2017). Adaptive cities. Incremental processes for a contemporary urban and territorial regeneration strategy. UPLanD-Journal of Urban Planning, Landscape & environmental Design, 2(3), 163-183.

Tillner, S. (2013). Incremental planning–cooperative scenario and/or masterplan? Long- and short-term planning horizon of urban design projects within the existing urban fabric. Analysis of projects in Vienna and Switzerland with regard to the factors triggering varying planning times. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society, 419- 428.

Turkstat. (2010). Statistical Indicators, 1923-2009 (Publication No: 3493).

Turner, J. F., & Wakely, P. (2015). Fifty Years of the Community‐Led Incremental Development: Paradigm for Urban Housing and Place‐Making. AD Reader Ground Rules for Humanitarian Design, 36-55.

Ungers, O. M., Kollhoff, H., Koolhaas, R., Ovaska, A., Riemann, P. (1977). Die Stadt in der Stadt; Berlin das grüne Stadtarchipel; ein stadträumliches Planungskonzept für die zuküngtige Entwicklung Berlins. Köln: Studioverlag für Architektur.

Ünlü, T. (2011). Towards the Conceptualization of Piecemeal Urban Transformation: The Case of Mersin, Turkey. Built Environment, 37(4), 445-461.

Wainer, L. S., Ndengeyingoma, B., & Murray, S. (2016). Incremental Housing, and Other Design Principles for Low-Cost Housing. Kigli: International Growth Centre.

Venturi, R., Scott Brown, D., & Izenour, S. (1972). Learning from Las Vegas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-15

How to Cite

Altürk, E. ., & AltInok, E. . (2020). Assessing Incremental Refurbishment as An Alternative to Demolish & Build-Anew: Lessons from An Architectural Design Studio Experience. ICONARCH International Congress of Architecture and Planning, (Iconarch -IV Proceeding Book), 929–958. Retrieved from https://iconarch.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarch/article/view/299

Issue

Section

SESSION 8A Theme: Architectural/Urban Design, Art and Aesthetics