Considering Computer Games as a Learning Tool

Authors

  • Emirhan Coşkun

Keywords:

computer games, education, learning tool

Abstract

This paper describes several aspects of the growing research field interested in video ganıes in education. The idea of reviewing conıputer ganıes is derived fronı developing a franıework of using ganıes as cognitive tools and integrating into the classroonı. In this paper three different fields related with the cognitive inıpact playing of video gam es are reviewed: abilities and skills, attitudes and nıotivation, knowledge and content leaming. However, nıost studies use video ganıes as new experinıental nıaterials and tasks to contribute to their specific field, and not as a scientific object of interest. Research on video ganıes need a nıethodological franıework in which results and effects can be conıpared, interpreted and generalized. Video ganıes can have nıultiple effects on players and these effects can be used as educational potentials. An enıpirically-based classification of ganıes, depending on their potential effects for an educational purpose, is strongly needed. Likewise, a unified research paradignı and nıethodologies to carry on reliable research on video ganıes have to be developed.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bowman, R.F. 1982. A Pac-Man theory of motivation. Tactical implications for classroom instruction. Educational Technology 22(9), 14-17.

Gentile, D. A., & Gentile, J. R. (2005). Violent video games as exemplary teachers. Paper presented at the Biennal meeting of the society for research in child development, Atlanta.

Hayes, J. R. (1981). The complete problem solver. Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Press.

Jacobs, J.W., & Dempsey, J. V. (1993). Simulation and gaming: Fidelity, feedback and motivation. In J. V., Dempsey & G. C. Sales (Eds.), Interactive instruction and feedback, Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

Kihlstrom, J.F. (1994). Cognition unawares [book review ofimplicit Leaming and Tacit Knowledge: an Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious by AH. Reber]. Science, 264, 1013.

Pea, R. D. (1985). Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20, 167-182.

Prensky, M. (2005). Computer games and leaming: digital game-based leaming. In J. Raessens & J. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of computer game studies. Cambridge: MlT Press.

Randel, J. M., Morris, B. A., Wetzel, C. D., & Whitehill, B. V. (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: A review of recent research. Simulation & Gaming, 23(3), 261-76.

Rieber,L. P., Smith, L.,& Noah, D. (1998). The value of serious play. Educational Technology, 38(6).

Salomon, G. (1993). On the nature of pedagogic computer tools: The case of the Writing Partner, In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.). Computers as cognitive tools. (pp. 179-198). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

Wood, L. E., Stewart, R.W. (1987). Improvement of practical reasoning skills with computer skills. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 14(2), 49-53.

Downloads

Published

2012-11-17

How to Cite

Coşkun, E. (2012). Considering Computer Games as a Learning Tool . ICONARCH International Congress of Architecture and Planning, (ICONARCH-1, Proceeding Book), 358–367. Retrieved from https://iconarch.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarch/article/view/48

Issue

Section

Using Computer Software in Architectural and Urban Design Processes