Change and Transformation of Cultural Landscape Components: A Case Study of Ulus Historic City Center, Ankara

Authors

  • Ali Kemal Arkun

Keywords:

Cultural Landscape, Landscape Change, Ulus Historic City Center

Abstract

Culture is the factor, nature is the medium and cultural landscape is the result. Researches on cultural landscape is increasing and gaining significance in order to understand, evaluate and protect the values of landscapes. Research, evaluation and protection of cultural landscape features provide values to be transferred to the future. At the same time conservation of cultural landscape areas in urban districts is very important to read and sustain spatial identity.

Ulus Historic City Center (llliCC) which has the most significant cultural landscape features of Ankara, is the main material of this research. The objective of this research is to explore how UHCC is changed from past to present, how it is affected by this change, how it is used today and documenting change and transformation of cultural landscape components within cultural landscape criteria method.

Aesthetic value, identity value, historical and archeological value, social value, artistic value and scientific value are determined cultural landscape criteria for this research. This methodology is used for digital documentation, interpretation and presentation of cultural heritage of UHCC. Cultural landscape components which can be examined in open, semi open and closed spaces (structures related to historic fabric, paths, squares, green spaces and other physical components) and besides social and cultural features of spaces is the content of this research. UHCC's most important five nodes and its vicinities which make significant contributions to its character, are selected. These nodes are historical focal points and contain various cultural landscape components. In this article one node is explained as a case study. Research included examining all available documentation dating from early settlement of the local area through present day. Historic maps, plans, photographs, pictures and drawings were examined and compared to determine changes and transformations occurred in the landscape throughout different periods of history.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Anonymous.1957. Ankara Aerial Photograph. General Command of Mapping. Anonymous. 2005. Turkish Dictionary. Turkish Language Association, Ankara.

Anonymous. 2008. Cultural landscapes and park management: a literature snapshot. Department of Environment and Climate Change, Australia.

Anonymous. 2010a. Altindag Municipality's Archive, Ankara. Anonymous. 2010b. Ankara Municipality's Archive, Ankara. Anonymous. 2011. Google Maps. Web site: http://maps.google.com.

Anonymous.1942. Ankara Aerial Photograph. General Command of Mapping.

Antrop, M. 2005. Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70, pp.21-34, Elsevier Science.

Cangir, A 2007. Cumhuriyetin Baskenti. Ankara University, 1422p., Ankara. Ingerson, A E. 2003. What are Cultural Landscapes?. Harvard University, US.

Lewis, P. F. 1979. Axioms for reading the landscape. The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes, Oxford University Press, pp. 11-32, New Yark.

Tuncer, M 2001. Ankara (Angora) Sehri Merkez Gelisimi (14.-20.Yy.). Turkish Ministry of Culture Publications, 11Op., Ankara.

Downloads

Published

2012-11-17

How to Cite

Arkun, A. K. (2012). Change and Transformation of Cultural Landscape Components: A Case Study of Ulus Historic City Center, Ankara. ICONARCH International Congress of Architecture and Planning, (ICONARCH-1, Proceeding Book), 225–234. Retrieved from https://iconarch.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarch/article/view/73

Issue

Section

Architecture and Technology Relationship in Social and Cultural Context