Recognition of the Concept of Urban Identity through the Place Attachment Case Study: Konya, Alaaddin Hill

Authors

  • Navid Khaleghimoghaddam
  • Bilgehan Yılmaz Çakmak

Keywords:

Place attachment, Spatial Identity, Environmental Psychology, Social Interaction, Alaaddin Hill

Abstract

The “place attachment” is a definition by the meeting point of activities, functional elements, and abstract meanings of the place. A place can come to the scene by the place attachment which has emotional and behavioral characteristics for people. Squares, plays an important role in conceptual, functional and physical aspects at the point of increasing the quality of urban spaces. In this context, it is an important issue to consider the impressive factors that connect people to the space and the square, in the case that the squares are desired, preferred and identity-possessed. This research examines the concept of place attachment through the process of environmental psychology, explains the factors of feeling belonging to the place, and examines the role of place in the formation of the desired and identifiable urban squares. It is based on a cognitive approach aimed at evaluating space perception on Alaaddin Hill in Konya city. This research and field study was carried out by observation and questionnaire on square users, and as well as by analyzing descriptive and inferential statistics. The findings of the study show that most of the users have place attachment. Thus, the user's perception and mind, proves that this square has an impressive role in gaining identity. The article thus prove that there is a relationship between place attachment and space identity, which can be addressed in the design of urban squares.

Alaaddin Mosque from the Seljuk period is at the center of this square and is considered as an important factor in the user's place attachment. The easy and convenient access to the meadow enhances, the presence of trees, plants and landscapes, cafes, walking routes, located in the square of the city center and appropriate abstract and concrete landscapes increases the feeling of being connected to the place. It is expected that the results of this research will be effective in designing new squares of contemporary cities.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

- Altman, I., & Low, S. (1992). Place attachment. New York: Plenum Press.

- Bonaiuto M. Aiello A, Perugini M, Bonnes M, Ercolani AP. Multidimensional perception of residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in the urban environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1999;9:331-52.

- Brown BB, Perkins DD. Disruptions in place attachment. Low SM, Altman I, editors. Place attachment. New York: Plenum Press; 1992.

- Canter, D. (1977). The Psychology of place. London: The Architectural Press Ltd.

-Conway MA, Playdell- Pearce CW. The constructional of autobiographical memories in the self- memoty system. Psychological Review 2000;107:261-88.

- Conway MA, Meares K, Standart S. Images & goals. Memory 2004;12: 525–31.

- Hernandez, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psycology, (18): 5-29.

- Low SM, Altman I. Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. Low SM, Altman I. editors. Place attachment. New York: Plenum; 1992.

- Low SM, Mc Donogh GW. Remapping the city: Place, order and ideology. American Anthropologist 2001;103:5-6.

- Milligan MJ. Interactional past and potential: The social construction of place attachment. Symbolic Interaction 1998;21:1-33.

- Pirbabaei, Mohammad Taghi. Gharehbaglou, Minou. Alinam Zahra, 2015, Place Attachment Process in Urban Studies: A Cognitive Psychology Approach. Journal of Advances in Cognitive Science. Vol. 17, No. 1.

- Proshansky HM, Fabian AK, Kaminoff R. Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1983; 3:57-83.

- Rapaport A. The meaning of the built environment, a nonverbal communication approach [F. Habib trans]. Tehran: Urban Planning and Processing Publications; 2005.[Persian].

- Riley, R. (1992). Attachment to the Ordinary Landscape. In Place Attachment. Edited by Altman, I. & Low, S. M., New York: Plenum Press.Riger S, Lavrakas PJ. Community ties: Patterns of attachment and social interaction in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Community Psychology 1981;9:5-66.

- Sajjadzadeh, Hassan, 2013, Role of Place Attachment in Making Identity for Urban Squares, Journal og Bagh-e Nazar, No.25, Vol.10.

- Scannell L, Gifford R. Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2010;30:1-10.

- Stedman, R. C. (2003). Is it really just a social construction? The construction of the physical environment to sense of place. Society & Natural Resources, 16(8): 671-685Twigger R, Uzzell DL. Place and identity processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1996; 16:205–20.

- Twigger R, Uzzell DL. Place and identity processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1996; 16:205–20.

- Williams, D.R., & Vaske, J.J. (2003).The measurement of Place Attachment: validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. forest Science, 49 (6): 830-840.

- Williams, D. R., et al. (1995). Measuring Place attachment: More Preliminary results. Paper presented at the 1995 Leisure Research Symposium.

- http://gezdimdegeldim.com/konya-center-trip-2/ (date of connection: 2017)

- http://konyalife.com.tr/haber/alaaddin-tepesi-efsanesi.html (date of connection: 2017)

- www.superaktif.net/gezi/konya-alaaddin-tepesi (date of connection: 2017)

Downloads

Published

2017-05-13

How to Cite

Khaleghimoghaddam, N., & Yılmaz Çakmak, B. (2017). Recognition of the Concept of Urban Identity through the Place Attachment Case Study: Konya, Alaaddin Hill. ICONARCH International Congress of Architecture and Planning, (1), 470–480. Retrieved from https://iconarch.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarch/article/view/198